PSY101 Workbook
 

Module I

Intelligence and psychological testing
(Weeks 14&15)
 
   
Task 1: Basics  Task 4: Abilities and race
Task 2: Individual versus group tests Task 5: Taking a culturally biased test
Task 3: Who's intelligent Task 6: Psychology testing and the law
 
 

Task 1: Basics

Read through Chapter 9 and go through the relevant section of your study guide. This is an important topic because it is one area where psychology has made an important contribution to the study of man. Those that intend to go in their study of psychology should certainly carefully read in this area.

By the time you entered university, it is highly likely that you had been exposed to a variety of tests which were applied in order to measure your mental abilities. It is not proposed to set any real test for you here, for their application and assessment is a complex matter. Further, many are copyrighted. Further, their use might compromise future validity should you have to the test in a real situation.

Read the chapter carefully, paying particular attention to the sections about reliability, validity, the predictive validity of tests and environmental and genetic influences. These four points persistently appear in the literature about psychological testing and you need to understand the differences between them. The report is due next week.

Return to Top

Task 2: Individual versus group tests

The textbook points out that the majority of intelligence tests given today are group tests rather than individual tests. In an individual intelligence test, the examiner plays a vital role, because the test requires interaction between the examiner and the subject (Murphy & Davidshofer, 1991). An individual test requires a response to a person, not merely to a question. For this reason, examiners must have extensive training in test administration. On the other hand, group intelligence tests tend to be paper-and-pencil tests requiring little expertise on the part of the person who administers them; in some cases, group tests can be self-administered. Individual tests are likely to involve subjective judgments on the part of the examiner during scoring and evaluation of the subject's responses. Group tests are likely to be multiple-choice tests that can be machine-scored. Finally, the examiner in an individual test may also play an evaluative or diagnostic role while administering the test. As Murphy & Davidshofer (1991) point out, individual intelligence tests are not given routinely but rather with some specific purpose in mind. Thus the way the subject responds may be as important as the response itself. It is virtually impossible to understand the reasoning behind a person's multiple-choice response, but an individual test gives the examiner an in-depth opportunity to observe the individual taking the test.

Advantages of group tests (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 1989):

Advantages of individual tests (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 1989): Many group tests are as reliable, valid and well standardised as the more renowned individual tests. Others, however, are somewhat lacking in these important areas. Thus, Kaplan & Saccuzzo (1989) urge caution when using group tests. They give four specific suggestions: All in all, group tests have been of great benefit to the testing field. Because of their economy and ease of administration, they have opened up testing to a wider variety of people and situations. In essence, they have made the work of the individual examiner more efficient, because the examiner can now concentrate on cases that specifically need or merit individualised attention.

Kaplan, R.M., & Saccuzzo, D.P. (1989). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Murphy, K.R., & Davidshofer, C.O. (1991). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Return to Top

Task 3: Who's intelligent

Read from Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Who's intelligent? People's conceptions of the nature of intelligence. The triarchic mind. New York, NY: Viking.

This reading is contained in the printed copy of your Workbook

Return to Top

Task 4: Abilities and race

Read: Elliott, R. (1988). Intelligence, 12, 333-350. (This reading is contained in the printed copy of your Workbook.)

Underlinings in the text in no way indicate or reflect my attitude about this issue. The document had been marked by a prior user. Personally I have quite strong feelings about this: apart from the issue of ego centrism or psychopathology if people wish to mark documents that are stored for the use of all of us they should mark them in pencil and then erase them. Highbrown graffiti.

Return to Top
 

Task 5: Taking a culturally biased test

There is a charge that many psychological tests are biased against racial, ethnic and cultural minorities. Minorities and nonminorities grow up in different environments that require different skills for survival. However, standardised tests typically test for skills and knowledge appropriate to a white, middle-class environment. According to Kaplan & Saccuzzo (1989), the practice of administering these tests to minorities "is analogous to testing a cat on a task designed to determine how well a rat is adapted to a rat's environment" (p.492).

Black sociologist Adrian Dove developed the Dove Counterbalance General Intelligence Test that has come to be known as the Chitling Test (from Newsweek, 1968). The Chitling Test is not standardised, does not have predictive validity and has only face validity (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 1989). The Chitling Test does, however, discriminate between people who have been exposed to Black culture of the 1960s and those who have not. It is tempting to say that it discriminates between North American blacks and whites, but this would be an overgeneralisation. However, it is probably a biased test as far as many college students are concerned.

To give you a chance to see what it is like to take a biased test, you can answer a sample of the Chitling Test (see below). Even this exercise will fall short of its intended purpose, however, unless you can believe or accept that, in the real world, scores on this test could be used to determine their future in such important areas as education and jobs. Failing miserably on such a test would be a devastating experience that could create a lifetime of helplessness, despair and failure.

Answers to the Chitling Test:
1-c, 2-c, 3-c, 4-d, 5-c, 6-e, 7-c, 8-c, 9-c, 10-c, 11-a, 12-c, 13-d
 

Kaplan, R.M., & Saccuzzo, D.P. (1989). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Taking the Chitling Test. (1968, July 15). Newsweek, pp.51-52.

The Chitling Test
 

Return to Top

Task 6: Psychology testing and the law

Reading from Ellison, K.W., & Buckout, R. (1981). Psychology and criminal justice. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

This reading is contained in the printed copy of your Workbook.

            Return to Schedule