|

|

Transition to school
The transition to
school has been recognised as one of the major challenges children have
to face in their early childhood years (Victorian Department of School
Education, 1992, p. 44). The challenge extends to all concerned, as parents,
teachers and children manage changes which can accompany the move to school
settings (Margetts, 1997). The expectations of each of these groups in
the transition to school influences, and is influenced by, the experiences
involved. Successful transitions involve collaboration between all of
these groups.
Much of the research
relating to children's transition to school has focused on the expectations
of teachers and parents (Davies & North, 1990; Hains, Fowler, Schwartz,
Kottwitz and Rosenkoetter, 1989). While parents and teachers share some
common expectations, there are differences between these groups, as well
as some within-group differences for teachers, depending on whether they
work in prior-to-school or school settings. For example, Haines et al.
(1989) reported that teachers in the first year of school focussed on
children's ability to function within a classroom environment, whereas
preschool teachers placed a strong emphasis on skills they saw as necessary
in an successful transition to school. Parents and teachers also may have
different expectations about transition to school.
Lewit and Baker (1995)
report that the majority (more than 75%) of teachers involved in their
study indicated that the children being physically healthy, rested and
well nourished were essential, while parents were much more likely than
teachers to report that academic skills were important in order for children
to make a successful transition to school. Both groups reported that communication
skills, enthusiasm and social skills were important.
Children starting school bring with them a wide array of experiences and
understandings. As a result, they experience the transition to school
in different ways (Rimm-Kaufman, Cox and Pianta, 1998). Despite this growing
recognition that the starting school experiences of children will differ,
there have been few attempts to investigate these experiences from the
perspectives of those children (Christensen, 1998; Dockett, Clyde & Perry,
1998).
The expectations of
participants also shape the transition experiences of children starting
school. Family support is influential in children'' adjustment to school
(Johnson, 1997) and in achieving successful learning outcomes (Hargreaves,
1994). Teacher's expectations - some of which are formed during the transition
period (Entwisle, 1995) - directly influence children's school experiences.
Teachers who facilitate parent participation tend to engender positive
attitudes towards school from both parents and children (Onsman, 1996).
Of the few studies which have considered children's expectations of school,
a sense of disappointment and negativity is reported among children whose
expectations do not match the reality (Brostrom, 1995; Christensen, 1998).
Children who have experienced the school context through repeated visits
or contact are more likely than others to hold realistic expectations
(Brostrom, 1995).
On the basis that
the transition to school has significant implications for children's later
learning and success, educations authorities around the world have developed
specific transition programs (for example, California State Department
of Education, 1997; Fox, 1995; Schuster & Hemmeter, 1995). While there
have been several efforts to do the same in New South Wales (Bowen, 1995;
Catholic Education Office, Parramatta, 1998; Sanderson & Nicholson, 1998),
there has not yet been a comprehensive state wide consideration of the
perceptions and expectations of the different groups of participants,
nor any major effort to develop transition programs which acknowledge
and respond to these.
Children who experience
similar environments and expectations at home and school are likely to
find the transition to school, as well as school in general, an easier
process (Nelson, 1995; Morrison, Griffith & Alberts, 1997). The converse
also holds - children who find school unfamiliar and unrelated to their
home contexts tend to experience difficulty, confusion and anxiety during
the transition. It is particularly where there are cultural differences
between home and school that effective transition programs are vital (Toomey,
1998). Such programs respect the different perspectives and expectations
that converge when children start school and aim to develop an effective
partnership between parents and teachers. Despite an array of literature
(for example, Davidowitz, 1998; Jang, 1995; Richardson, 1997), there is
disagreement as to what constitutes effective transition programs. While
it is to be expected that different programs are effective in different
contexts, there remain few published or publicly debated sets of general
principles to guide those developing and implementing transition programs.
There is evidence that teachers developing transition programs are influenced
both by their theoretical position and by their expectations of children
and families in different environments. For example, Nelson (1995) has
reported differences in teacher expectation when children are from urban,
suburban or rural environments, belong to minority or non-minority groups,
and where there are different socio-economic backgrounds. These expectations
have influenced what is included in transition programs as well as what
constitutes a successful transition. In many cases, teachers but not parents
or children, make these decisions. While there are similarities in the
expectations of parents and teachers about what is important as children
start school, there was sufficient difference (evident from the pilot
studies conducted 1996-98; see About the Project: History) to suggest
that both groups may be working towards eh same aim of a successful transition,
but in very different ways. The considerable difference between the expectations
of the adult and child participants in transition suggests that, whatever
the adults are doing, it is interpreted by the children in terms of rules.
The result is that there will be times of confusion and conflicting expectations
that could be avoided if all participants had a more active role in discussing
or planning transition experiences.
Top
of page
Aims
of the project
The aim of the project
is to work collaboratively with parents, teachers and children to develop,
implement and evaluate transition programs which are socially and culturally
relevant for their contexts. As a result of the Pilot Studies we know
that there are significant differences in perceptions of adults - teachers
and parents - and children about what is important for effective transition
to school (Dockett & Perry, 1999; Perry et al, under review). In this
project, we seek to expand and use this information to the practical aim
of developing, trialing and evaluating effective transition to school
programs. Specifically the aims of the project are to:
- Analyse data from
the pilot studies in order to develop general principles underpinning
effective transition to school programs. Such principles will take account
of the geographical, socio-economic, cultural and special needs of the
stakeholders.
- Distribute these
principles widely through the industry partners and related services,
in order to promote broad discussion.
- Work collaboratively
in specific school communities to develop transition programs which
reflect these principles.
- Provide ongoing
professional development support for the trial of these programs, through
regular contact with teachers and/or relevant consultants.
- Establish a framework
for the evaluation of these programs, both from within and from outside
the school community.
- Revise the programs
according to the results of the trial.
- Disseminate information
relating to best practice in relation to transition to school programs.
- Enhance the learning
outcomes of young children by establishing and maintaining collaborative
interaction among children, parents and teachers.
Top
of page
Significance
The
significance of the project lies in the potentially positive outcomes
for young children as they participate in relevant transition programs,
the nature of the collaboration supporting the project and the research
methodology which recognises the influence and expectations of children
as well as parents and teachers, on school experiences.
Children's
images of themselves as learners are influenced greatly by their school
experiences (Hadley, Wilcox & Rice, 1994). Their experiences of success,
or otherwise, have a direct impact on their future success at school and
on their own sense of self and self esteem. Children who experience academic
and social difficulties in the early school years are likely to continue
having problems throughout their school careers, and indeed, through their
adult life (Maxwell, 1993; Parker & Asher, 1987). Such difficulties may
be evidenced by grade retention, a low self-esteem, disruptive behaviour
or an overall attribution of failure. Effective transition programs have
the potential to help children - and their parents - feel comfortable,
valued and successful in school and hence, to avoid these negative outcomes.
As the study involves the major stakeholders in early childhood education,
including the children themselves, across various geographical regions
in New South Wales, it has the potential to influence practice for significant
numbers of children. It is innovative in that it builds upon the extensive
use of survey and focus group interviews with the stakeholders in children's
transition to school in a wide variety of locations across New South Wales.
Based on the pilot studies, the project expects to find differences in
these locations and is designed to respect these. At the completion of
the project and subject to the recognition of intellectual property, the
set of principles, transition programs and relevant evaluation data will
be made available for use by the industry partners. The major theoretical
advance in the early childhood field to come from this study is the move
away from the expectation that transition programs can be the same for
all communities and all groups across the state and nation. This will
result from the recognition of the different perceptions and expectation
of all participants and the active responses to them, rather than the
typical, centralised approaches which have been characteristic of the
large school education authorities in the past. The outcomes of the project
will have direct benefit outside New South Wales by providing validated
guidelines for transition to school programs. These guidelines will be
adaptable to many different contexts, as will the programs developed from
them. Publication and dissemination of these guidelines and programs through
the national groupings of which the industry partners for this project
are members will facilitate their use in other states and territories
of Australia as transition to school programs which reflect the needs
and perspectives of different communities in these states and territories
are developed.
The
project brings together a large number of stakeholders who have particular
interest in young children's transition to school. The number of partners
reflects the complex nature of the early childhood field. Their willingness
to come together to work collaboratively on a project such as this reflects
the important the area to each of the partners, as well as their belief
that the Chief Investigators
have the necessary skills, background and professional standing to address
the issues inherent in children's transition to school. Each of the industry
partners is committed to the project and has been a part of its development
through their active participation in the Advisory
Committee which has guided the Pilot Studies.
Top
of page
History
& methodology
Pilot Studies
The research here
outlined builds on a series of pilot studies conducted in 1996, 1997 and
1998, which involved focus group interviews (Minichiello, Aroni, Timewell
& Alexander, 1995) with parents, teachers in prior-to-school settings,
teachers in school settings, children who had just started school, children
who were about to start school, and children who had been at school for
some time. Using grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), interview data
were analysed, and response categories were created to reflect the issues
which were reported by parents, teachers and children as important to
consider when children started school (Dockett & Perry, 1999; Perry, Dockett
& Tracey, 1998b). These categories, supported by relevant research, were
used to develop an extensive questionnaire, which was distributed to parents
and teachers across New South Wales in 1998.
Several trends emerged
from the questionnaire and
interview data. The categories identified in the pilot studies were supported
by confirmatory factor analysis, as were the different patterns of responses
from parents, teachers and children reported in the pilot studies. For
example, both teachers and parents indicated that social adjustmentto
the school setting was the most important aspect to consider, followed
by the child's disposition towards school and learning, and then the requisite
skills to operate in a school setting. Parents, but not teachers, also
indicated that it was important for children to demonstrate some knowledge
(such as reading or writing their name) before starting school (Dockett,
Perry & Tracey, 1997; Perry, Dockett & Howard, under review). Parents
were also more concerned than teachers about children's physical adjustment
to school and about the nature of the educational environment they had
chosen for their child. In contrast, the overwhelming response from children
interviewed was that it was important to know the rules which apply at
school. Some 76% of all responses from the children in the pilot studies
stressed the rules category, with very few mentioning knowledge (10%)
and skills (7%) (Perry, Dockett & Tracey, 1998a, 1998b). The Starting
School project builds on the pilot studies by using the data already gathered
to inform the development of transition programs. Parents and teachers
in 15 locations across New South Wales have completed the questionnaire.
By the end of 2000 further groups of parents and teachers, as well as
groups of children, in the same locations, will have been interviewed
in order to provide elaboration of the questionnaire responses.
Methodology
The project has four
phases:
- Identification
of an agreed set of principles which underpin effective transition programs.
- Development of
transition programs based on these principles and community involvement.
- Trialing of these
programs.
- Evaluation and
refinement of these programs according to the principles identified
in the first phase.
Data from each phase
will be analysed and used to inform subsequent phases. The approach involves:
- Identification
of, and regular interaction with, local contact personnel in each region.
- Meetings with members
of participant groups to discuss the set of principles.
- Collaborative planning
of the transition programs, facilitated by staff of the project.
- Implementation
of the programs.
- Case studies to
measure the effect of the transition programs on learning outcomes.
- Evaluating the
programs through documentation and interviews with participants.
- Reporting back
to participants on the data collected for validation and response.
- Adapting the programs
in response to the evaluation.
Top
of page
Future
Expected Outcomes
One general outcome
from the project is the continuation of an extensive collaborative research
network of early childhood educators and services involved in young children's
transition to school. Meetings of the stakeholders formed to guide the
Pilot Studies have resulted in new alliances and a greater awareness of
services across the state (Dockett, Howard & Perry, 1999; Perry, Howard,
Dockett & Tracey, 1998).
Specific outcomes
of the project are:
The publication of
a set of general principles which underpin effective transition programs.
It is anticipated that this will generate a range of discussion and debate
about transition programs, which in itself, will heighten the profile
of these programs within schools and within school communities.
A model for the collaborative
planning of context-relevant transition to school programs.
Several different
models of transition programs, developed in and for specific contexts.
An evaluative framework
to assess the quality and relevance of transition programs.
Trial of these programs
and evaluation based on the established criteria.
A portfolio representing
examples of best practice in transition programs, based on the guidelines
and the consideration of the social context of the stakeholders.
Top
of page
Furtrher
reading
Bowen, A. (1995).
The educational interface: Action and reaction: A collaborative approach.
ED 400936.
Brostrom, S. (1995). An investigation of 565 children's expectation
to life in Kindergarten class in school. Paper presented at CIDREE,
Paris, September.
California State Department of Education. (1997). Continuity for young
children: Positive transitions to elementary school. ED 405998.
Catholic Education Office, Parramatta (1998). Coping with Kindergarten
videotape. Sydney: Author.
Christensen, C. (1998). Managing children's transition to school: A case
of multiple perspectives. Paper presented at the OMEP XXII World Congress,
Copenhagen, August.
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (Fourth
edition). London: Routledge.
Davidowitz, E. (1988). Is your child ready for kindergarten? Working
Mother, 11(6), 79-83.
Davies, M. & North, J. (1990). teacher's expectations of school entry
skills. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 15(4), 44-46.
Dockett, S., Clyde, M., & Perry, B. (1998). Starting school: The voices
of children. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian
Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, December.
Dockett, S., Howard, P. & Perry, B. (1999). Research partnerships in early
childhood: Forming the bonds. Challenge of Change in Education Symposium.
Sydney, February.
Dockett, S. & Perry, B. (1999). Starting school: Perspectives from Australia.
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Montreal, Canada, April.
Dockett, S., Perry, B. & Parker, R. (1996). Early literacy component:
Evaluation report for New South Wales Department of School Education.
Macsearch: Sydney.
Dockett, S., Perry, B. & Tracey, D. (1997). Getting ready for school.
Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association
for Research in Education, Brisbane, December.
Entwisle, D. R. (1995). The role of schools in sustaining early childhood
program benefits. The Future of Children, 5 (3), Winter.
Erickson, F. (1987). Conceptions of school culture. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 23(4), 11-24.
Flinspach, S. L. & Ryan, S. P. (1994). Diversity of Outcomes: Local Schools
under School Reform. Education & Urban Society, 26(3), 292-305.
Fox, W. (1995). National TEEM Outreach: Transition into the elementary
education mainstream. Final report. ED 392200.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R. & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research
(Sixth edition). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies
for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hadley, P. A., Wilcox, K. A. & Rice, M. L. (1994). Talking at school:
Teacher expectations in preschool and kindergarten. Early Childhood
Research Quarterly, 9, 111-129.
Hains, A. H., Fowler, S. A., Schwartz, I. S., Kottwitz, E., & Rosenkoetter,
S. (1989) A comparison of preschool and kindergarten teacher expectations
for school readiness. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4, 75-88.
Hargreaves, D. (1994). Concluding comments and synthesis. Proceedings
of Forward Together: Partners in Education Early Childhood Education Seminar,
Sydney, April.
Jang, Y. (1995). Critical elements and practices of transition programs
linking early childhood education and early elementary school. ED 390566.
Johnson, V. J. K. (1997). Family level processes in children's adaptation
to school. ED 408025.
Lewit, E. M. & Baker, L. S. (1995). School readiness. The Future of
Children, 5(2), 128-139.
Margetts, K. (1997). Factors impacting on children's adjustment to the
first year of primary school. Early Childhood Folio, 3, 53-56.
Maxwell, K. L. (1993). Relationships among achievement, behaviour,
social status, and risk for retention in Kindergarteners. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis
(Second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth
interviewing. Melbourne: Longman Australia.
Morrison, F. J., Griffith, E. M. & Alberts, D. M. (1997). Nature-nurture
in the classroom: Entrance age, school readiness, and learning in children.
Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 254-262.
Nelson, R. F. (1995). The social context of readiness. ED 393838.
Onsman, Y. (1996). Parent participation rights and responsibilities: A
true partnership between home and school. ED 403019.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal
adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin,
102, 357-89.
Paul Hamlyn Foundation National Commission on Education, (1993). Learning
to succeed: A radical look at education today and a strategy for the
future. Heinemann: London.
Perry, B., Dockett, S. & Howard, P. (under review). Starting school: Issues
for children, parents and teachers. Journal of Australian Research
in Early Childhood Education.
Perry, B., Dockett, S. & Tracey, D. (1998a). Ready to learn: Exploring
the concept of school readiness and its implications. Paper presented
at the Seventh Australia and New Zealand Conference on the First Years
of School, Canberra, January.
Perry, B., Dockett, S. & Tracey, D. (1998b). At preschool they read to
you, at school you learn to read: Perspectives on starting school. Australian
Journal of Early Childhood. 23 (4), 6-11.
Perry, B., Howard, P., Dockett, S. & Tracey, D. (1998). Research in early
childhood education: Partnerships count. Annual Conference of Australian
Association for Research in Education. Adelaide, December.
Richardson, L. (1997). Review of transition from home to school. Australian
Journal of Early Childhood, 22(1), 18-22.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Cox, M. & Pianta, R. (1998). teachers judgements
of success in the transition to Kindergarten. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego,
April.
Sanderson, R. & Nicolson, D. (1998). Getting ready for school. In Proceedings
of the Seventh Australia and New Zealand Conference on the First Years
of School. Canberra.
Saurino, D. R. & Saurino, P. L. (1995). Collaborative action research:
The High Scope curriculum for Georgia Public Preschools. ED 396818.
Schuster, J. W. & Hemmeter, M. L. (1995). Project STEPS: Sequenced transition
to education in the public schools. National Outreach Project Annual Evaluation
and Final Report, 1994-95. ED 393267.
Schweinhart, L. J. & Weikart, D. P. (1993). A summary of Significant
benefits: The High Scope/Perry Preschool Study through age 27Õ. High
Scope Press.
Toomey, D. (1989). How home-school relations policies can increase educational
inequality: A three year follow-up. Australian Journal of Education,
33(3), 284-298.
Victorian Department of School Education. (1992). The ministerial review
of school-entry age in Victoria. Victoria: Author.
Top
of page
ABOUT
| TEAM | COMMITTEE
| NEWSLETTER | ABSTRACTS
| INFORMATION NOTICEBOARD
| DISCUSSION
|